Archive for July, 2009

Switching over from Windows to Linux.. and I’m not a Linux geek!

After a failed attempt at using Linux 10 years ago, this year I finally plucked up the courage to try it out again. This time round it was a complete success and now I use this almost completely in place of Windows. The performance and cost advantages for outweigh compatibility problems and re-learning requirement to use it. Windows isn’t the only operating system out there! Why don’t you give something new a try? And you can always jump back between Windows and Linux whenever you need.. you can’t lose!

The first attempt in 1999

I heard about Linux many years ago as an alternative to Windows. Out of interest I decided to try it out to see what it was like. I came across a version called Armed Linux. Now usually Linux doesnt use windows filesystems (in those days it was FAT16 and FAT32) and I dont remember such luxuries as partitioning or dual boot. If I wanted to use Linux I would have to switch completely over from Windows. However, Armed Linux was special in that it ran a complete filesystem within a single file on a windows formatted hard drive. This would allow running Linux within windows, relieving the need to completely switch over to an alien system.

It sounded like the perfect way to test it out. Shame it was a terrible experience and it put me off using Linux for years to come. Firstly, it was slow. I had to first boot to windows, then run Linux as an application on top of it. The boot time must have been at least 15 minutes. And then after that using the linux system was incredibly slow. I got to a bash prompt (it didnt go to a graphics interface first like newer versions) and navigated the folders on the system. I finally managed to work out how to get to the graphics system to load but there was no reward. It had no applications to run beyond a simple text editor and calculator, and it was un-usably slow. Slower than windows! On top of that, I had to give 800mb to this test, nearly half of my 1.7gb hard drive. So even working in windows afterwards was an even more painful experience, having removed all my games and having to be careful of every megabyte of usage. Within days I had uninstalled and went firmly back to windows. A failed experiment.

Attempt 2 – 2009

A decade later and a whole different world. Laptops are everywhere and everyone’s on-line but Windows is still going strong. My laptop is 3 years old and Windows has been re-installed 3 times, at least. A fresh clean installation is tidy and fast but over time the whole system slows down. Starting up the computer used to be a pleasure, but now it takes a coffee break to wait for it to start up. Opening explorer windows is now a painful experience and don’t you dare click that start button unless it is an absolute necessity. No amount of defragging and anti-virus checking can save you, its time for another format.

At the start of this year I was preparing myself for the yearly format; out with the old and in with the new. Downloading all the basic programs I’d need simply to get online to get my old set-up back again safely. Anti-virus, Windows XP Service pack 3, Firefox, firewall software..

And I thought about that horrible experience with Linux all those years ago. I had heard about how Ubuntu linux was easy to use and very popular so I thought I’d give it a try. I had nothing to lose after all, as I would be formatting anyway.

So I downloaded the CD image from the site. The 700mb~ size download took a matter of minutes to download, I remember when downloading my Linux on 56k modem; the 300mb file took me days and days, spread out each evening after I got home from school.. how far we have come!

The installation process was relatively painless. I put the burned CD in the laptop and turned it on. I had to create a new linux partition to install it to, so it did require a fresh install of windows beforehand to get enough space on the hard drive. After installing I found it got all the drivers for my laptop just fine and it also picked the correct resolution for my 15.4 inch widescreen display.

Using Ubuntu Linux does require learning to use a different User Interface from windows, but I found it no more difficult than learning how to use a mac after using a Windows PC beforehand. If you can get to the control panel in windows and install a driver, then you can learn how to use Linux.

The problem that many say is that because Windows is far more popular, you wont get your software to run under Linux. To a certain extent this is true. I have not found Internet Explorer on Linux (and there are still some websites that only work with IE, such as banking sites and official TV on-demand sites) but for the absolute majority of cases there is alternate software which does the job just as well, if not better. Firefox and Open Office replace Internet Explorer and Microsoft Office. I have found these replacements to not only work in the majority of cases with anything I use it for, including Microsoft’s own file formats, but its quicker and crashes much less than the windows equivalents. These are also available for free download which runs on Windows.

Once I got used to the change in user interface / window layouts, etc I found Linux to be a far more efficient system to use. Startup / Shutdown times are faster, crashes less and doing things like window switching, browsing for files on the hard drive and clicking through the menus just worked a lot quicker. It is even faster than my clean install of windows.

However there will be times when you just need to use Windows. If you want iTunes, a website only Internet explorer can run or a Video Game, then Linux can’t help you. But with a dual boot installation (Very easy to set up) you can restart the computer into Windows and do what you need to do. Just be prepared for the pain of the slowdown when going back..

Consumer choice

Windows certainly has the stronghold on OS of choice. Its practically impossible to not see Windows installed on a computer that isn’t a netbook. And this probably wouldn’t matter for a casual computer user who just wants to surf the net, do email and use office to create documents and spreadsheets. So does it matter that alternatives exist that allow you to do the same thing as can would do anyway with your pre-installed Windows?…

Something I’m very glad to see in recent times is the rise in popularity of price comparison websites. You now have a choice in suppliers for gas, electricity and car insurance. Its changing the vision of a nation to show they have the power to shift to the competition and get a better deal. All it requires is effort to find the alternatives.

Its surprising to know that Windows operating systems are one of the few who actually charge, when there are so many others which are completely free. Its especially surprising when the gap between usability is so small and the performance is actually worse than the free alternatives.

I have been using Ubutu Linux for a few months now and I am very happy to use this as an alternative to Windows. I am certainly no geek when it comes to Linux; I don’t know how to change the screen resolution or change the theme colours, but I have figured out how to use open office and use firefox and the performance difference is enough for me to stick with it. It will be interesting to see how things go in the future when google’s Chrome OS is released.

So the next time you are sitting in front of a 30 second splash screen waiting for your email or Word to load up, why not consider looking at some of the alternatives? It wont cost you anything and you might just be surprised at how much more efficient you could be..

2 Comments

PhotoReading… does it work ?

I recently became aware of the concept of Photo Reading by Paul Scheele. According to the advertising and youtube video this was supposed to increase your reading speed to over 100,000 words per minute. Impossible! How can your mind actually process that many words; moreover, how can your eyes even move that fast to pick it all up! I dismissed this as internet-myth got back to work. However, later I found someone recommend it and I found myself looking over it again.

This time I decided to have a more in-depth look and see how it works, and perhaps try out a few things.

The end result was different from what I expected it would be. In my opinion you aren’t really reading at 100,000 words a minute like it claims. But it did help me to realise that books aren’t as scary as I once thought, and I can grab the important points very quickly.

Handling my time and thoughts. Controlling the boredom: Concentrate more.

The first thing I discovered about this is that I needed to control my time better to enable me to read more efficiently. Before I would constantly be putting off reading anything, whether it be textbooks in school and uni or for my own pleasure later on. To me, there was always something better to do, such as playing a video game, talking or going out with friends, or even just tidying my room or cleaning the dishes. Reading was boring! The times I eventually gave myself to read were when I was tired, I was pre-occupied with other things in my life. Even when I started getting into the story or the main part of the book, I started feeling uncomfortable in the chair, I wanted to stretch my legs, move my neck, go for a walk. I felt physically uncomfortable just sitting there reading!

However to find out about the photo reading concept, I had to give myself time to at least watch the DVDs. There were 3 of them and the main sections each took 50 mins or so. I found watching a DVD about reading was more tolerable than actually reading itself so I found little difficulty in doing that. Actually I watched each DVD twice over 2 weeks whilst washing the dishes at the same time, watching on the laptop.

I became excited at the thought of being able to read better. When it came time to put into practise what I had watched, I was mentally more ready to begin reading a book. The actual process of photo reading felt more physically active; The first phase requires flipping though the pages of the book, turning pages once every 2 seconds. Then afterwards, going in-depth into the sections of the book that I wanted to. There was also some work done on ‘getting into the zone’ before doing anything, which helped me greatly to concentrate more. Just taking 3 breaths before beginning to read really helped.

Another approach which surprised me was the act of reading a book cover-to-cover in one sitting. I had previously never thought about doing this (especially when it took me a good 20 minutes to read 10 pages, by which time I was ready to die..) Now reading the whole book in one go became the purpose. Books I have read recently have taken 1 to 2 hours. By putting these amounts of time into reading it means I have planned specifically to give this amount of time to reading it, so my mind doesn’t wander as much. I am concentrated on the book and what I have to learn from it. When I read like this, whether I am bored or not doesn’t come into my thoughts; my purpose for that time is to read that book.

The belief that it all works

Some concepts in the programme seem a little far-fetched. My ‘Realist’ mind found it hard to accept some of the ideas proposed. For example, the first phase of reading any book is to flick through the book, a page turn every 2 seconds. The idea is that the information becomes embedded into your sub-concious mind where it lives forever. After that you can use your ‘intuition’ to decide what parts of the book to read to pick up what your subconscious mind has decided you actually need to read; the important bits of the book.

However, I decided to press ahead and try a bit of ‘what if’ scenarios whilst practising this technique. What if your subconscious mind is always there trying to direct you and all you need to do is let it guide you? Just picking random bits to read is its way of directing your conscious mind to where it knows you really want to read.

The result was a mixed bag. I picked up random bits throughout a book, and I feel that I did pick up the general feeling of a chapter by just reading a few lines on each page, however there was the niggling voice at the back of my mind saying ‘You haven’t picked everything up; theres something missing’ One thing I found however is that I didnt get bored at all of reading it. So many times before when I felt that it was a drudgery just getting to the end of a chapter. Not this time. If I felt like skipping a few lines, or a few pages, it was OK for me to do so. Chances are the reason I got bored was because there wasn’t really any new ideas being portrayed in them. Apparently 4% of the words in English text contains the core ideas, the rest is just filler to make the structure. That thought stuck with me. If I can train my mind to pick up the ideas from the 4% of text, then I can skip the rest and whats truly important. Even though it goes against what I believe is real, for now Ill run with this idea because it seems to work for me, despite no real explanation as to why it works.

End results

After watching the DVDs and trying the techniques with a few books, my friend asked me to read a fiction book. She told me she read it in a day, so it would be a nice easy read for me (books never are, for me at least) and she told me it was a nice story.

It was the story of a man who tried to kill himself. But it had the lead up of his life and how things went from bad to worse, beginning with the death of his mother 10 years previously. The final straw was when his daughter did not invite him to her wedding, as he was a trouble maker, drunk, embarrassment to the family. But the suicide attempt failed and he saw his mother, for one last goodbye and a chat about the bad things he resented in his life. In the end he saw the errors in his ways, and lived for another 5 years, making life better for himself and was satisfied with what he had.

It took me an hour and a half to ‘read’ the 200 pages. By the end of it I had the storyline in my head, and I knew key emotional points throughout the book; the moment when he found out his mother died, when he decided that life wasn’t worth it, when he decided it was worth it.

I was questioned later on about the story, I found that I didnt know know what the man’s name was, or his ex-wife. Or in fact any of the characters names. I also didnt know about the little child-hood flashback stories when he was a boy. However I did go into detail about his passion for baseball, which was instilled by his father. How this passion eventually led to his missing the day his mother died, and his failing in the team led to the loss of his father in his life. How he survived the car crash, though he wished he didn’t. And how he turned his life around.

Whilst I did lose certain facts of the story, there were parts I wouldn’t consider to be exciting, or even provide any point to the real story. Subconsciously I cut them out, and I can honestly say I don’t feel that I missed out on anything. And at the end, I read a book in 2 hours which would otherwise have taken weeks of time to read.

I would recommend at least looking at this way of reading. If anything, it shows that as a reader, you don’t have to blindly plow through every single word in a book. Its boring and pointless. You can choose the main points to pick up, and usually those points are very concise and it takes no time at all to pick them up. I have photoread 5 books this week, versus no more than 3 normally read in the last 2 years. I aim to continue learning about speed reading and photo reading and making reading books a more enjoyable part of my life.

Tags: , , , , , ,

6 Comments